“The greens already plan to file [lawsuits] early and often,” CEI's Chris Horner observes. “What this does is embolden defendants, lawmakers, and even judges."
Climategate takes steam out of global warming litigation
The case for scrapping product liability
Product liability may be overkill for large firms responsive to market forces and subject to governmental regulation, say Mitchell Polinsky and Steven Shavell of the National Bureau of Economic Research.
Public nuisance highlights
Novel uses of public nuisance and concerns over contingency arrangements were frequent themes for Public Nuisance Wire in 2009.
2009 paint litigation roundup
Paint litigation was a frequent focus for Public Nuisance Wire in 2009.
Contingency arrangements undermine governmental neutrality
The amicus brief submitted in August by the National Paint & Coatings Association (NPCA) in Pennsylvania v. Janssen Pharmaceutica is an excellent companion piece to Janssen’s January application for extraordinary relief.
Possible federal judge opened checkbook for 13 senators
PROVIDENCE, R.I. - Since 2000, trial lawyer Jack McConnell has contributed to the campaigns of 13 current U.S. senators who may eventually help make him a federal judge.
Ramifications of Comer v. Murphy Oil
J. Russell Jackson, a partner with Skadden Law who defends companies’ products and advertising in trial and appellate courts, spoke to Public Nuisance Wire about the ramifications of the Fifth circuit's Comer decision.
Fifth Circuit Reverses Dismissal of Climate Change Class Action
On October 16, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit became the second federal appeals court in less than a month to reverse a trial court decision that had thrown out a climate change lawsuit for presenting a nonjusticiable political question.
Public nuisance suits can have negative consequences
In an exclusive interview with Public Nuisance Wire, Lisa Perrochet of Horvitz & Levy explains some of the negative consequences of public nuisance suits.
Will Santa Clara learn from Rhode Island?
Last July, the Supreme Court of Rhode Island held that the state “cannot allege” facts sufficient to state a claim for common law public nuisance against lead pigment manufacturers. In the upcoming Santa Clara v. ARCO case, the same rules may apply.
McConnell tapped tobacco war chest to fund 9-year lead paint battle
PROVIDENCE, R.I. - For nine years prospective federal judge nominee Jack McConnell battled paint makers with boundless powers he received from attorneys general he helped elect.
Judge tosses Kivalana global warming suit
SAN FRANCISCO – A U.S. District Court Judge has dismissed a lawsuit filed by an Alaskan native village that targeted Exxon Mobil, alleging the oil company was responsible for global warming.
The underlying message of climate change regulation
ATLANTA -- The Second Circuit's recent ruling that electric utility companies can be sued for allegedly contributing to global warming could have devastating consequences for southern states, according to one environmental expert.
U.S. Chamber responds to Second Circuit decision
Harold Kim of the U.S. Chamber's Institute for Legal Reform (ILR) believes that the Second Circuit's recent decision in Connecticut v. American Electric Power is something to be alarmed about.
Legalizing theft by lawsuit
In light of subsequent actions against lead paint and asbestos manufacturers, a 2001 commentary by Robert Levy of the Cato Institute on contingency-fee arrangements seems positively prescient.
Climate change nuisance ruling threatens all industries
"The Second Circuit's decision is extraordinarily broad and entails major risks for all industries, not just the electric utilities," say Richard O. Faulk and John S. Gray of Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP.
Global warming ruling invites copycat suits
HARTFORD, Conn. -- This week’s Second Circuit Court ruling could have profound implications for the future of climate change litigation, according to an environmental law expert.
Second Circuit reinstates climate change public nuisance case
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has ruled that five of the nation’s largest electric utility companies can be sued for creating a public nuisance by emitting greenhouse gases (GHG) that allegedly contribute to global warming.
TVA must install pollution controls during public nuisance appeal
ASHEVILLE, N.C. (Legal Newsline) - The decision to have Tennessee Valley Authority spend hundreds of millions of dollars in pollution controls at four of its power plants won't be stayed during the company's appeal.
North Carolina Foundation Scrutinizes TVA Case
Targeting a company across state lines is not the only thing that makes North Carolina’s lawsuit against the Tennessee Valley Authority controversial. According to David Bass of the Carolina Journal, the lawsuit is also costing taxpayers money and jobs.
The unintended consequences of North Carolina v. TVA
As State of North Carolina v. Tennessee Valley Authority grinds inexorably forward, opponents of North Carolina's claim foresee a worst-case scenario in which state-created environmental regulations supersede established federal regulations.
EPA endangerment finding: not for tort use
WASHINGTON DC -- The Washington Legal Foundation (WLF) has urged the EPA to clarify that any Endangerment Finding it may issue with regard to greenhouse gases is not meant for use in tort cases.
Chamber, et al. file amicus brief in TVA interstate pollution case
RICHMOND, Va. -- The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has filed an amicus brief in the appeal of State of North Carolina v. Tennessee Valley Authority, asserting that the previous ruling in the case violates existing federal air pollution provisions.
Alabama intervenes in North Carolina public nuisance suit
ASHEVILLE, N.C. (Legal Newsline) - Alabama Attorney General Troy King is getting his chance to intervene in North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper's public nuisance suit against power provider Tennessee Valley Authority.
New York City v Exxon Mobil trial underway
NEW YORK – New York City lawyers are trying to convince a jury in a United States District Court in Manhattan that Exxon Mobil knew an additive it used in gasoline would eventually contaminate groundwater.
The next target for public nuisance suits
As cash-strapped states and cities look for unconventional ways to come up with funds for basic services, one attorney believes they will set their sights on an unpopular industry: subprime mortgage lenders.
TVA decision threatens corporate America
North Carolina v. Tennessee Valley Authority is "one of the most significant public nuisance victories ever by a plaintiff," warns attorney Trent Taylor. If upheld, it could pose a threat to successful businesses all across America.
California contingency cases have potential for fiscal devastation
Legal blogger Jane Genova has a theory on the impact that public nuisance contingency cases could have on the country – and it’s catastrophic.
TVA case turning into “legal thriller”
ASHEVILLE, NC -- The case of North Carolina v Tennessee Valley Authority is beginning to look more like a soap opera every day. Last month, the state of Alabama joined more than 200 plaintiffs in a case that could end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.
Cordray weighs in on lead paint, etc.
COLUMBUS, Ohio -- Ohio Attorney General Richard Cordray recently sat down with RightOhio blogger Matt Naugle to discuss public nuisance lawsuits aimed at lead paint manufacturers and other issues facing the Buckeye State's top law enforcement official.
Positive trend for defendants in product liability
Jim Beck, of counsel at Dechert LLP in the mass torts and product liability group in Philadelphia, spoke to Public Nuisance Wire about changes in product liability and the impact they've had on defendants.
Pending Contingency Rulings Could Spark Lawsuit Abuse by AGs
Contingency contracts between law firms and the government are continuing to raise eyebrows, especially when political contributions come into play.
Public Nuisance Trial Jumpstarts No-Nonsense Legal Blog
In a conversation about everything from court cases to Buddhism, it's easy to see why her blog is becoming a must-read for legal professionals and law junkies alike.
Insurers Dodge Coverage for Public Nuisance Claims
HARTFORD, Ct. -- Once reserved for small disputes, public nuisance claims have become the weapon of choice for plaintiffs’ attorneys eager to circumvent statutes of limitations, causation and product identification requirements, etc.
Recent Entries
- Our watchdog press enabled the global warming hoax 10 Feb 2010
- Climategate takes steam out of global warming litigation 03 Feb 2010
- Courts rule against cities in subprime mortgage suits 27 Jan 2010
- Utah manufacturers protest EPA action 20 Jan 2010
- Memphis jumps on the subprime suit bandwagon 13 Jan 2010
- The case for scrapping product liability 06 Jan 2010
- Facts fudged in smoking ban campaigns 05 Jan 2010
- Public nuisance highlights 30 Dec 2009
- 2009 paint litigation roundup 29 Dec 2009
- Damage caps were an essential piece of tort reform 28 Dec 2009
