CHICAGO -- Second Amendment advocacy groups say McDonald v. Chicago could be a bigger landmark case than last year’s Heller.
McDonald decision expected to build upon Heller
Will McDonald be another victory for gun rights?
The Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) has filed a brief in the Supreme Court case of McDonald v. Chicago and expects a decision favoring gun rights. SAF President Alan Gottlieb spoke to Public Nuisance Wire about the ramifications of such a victory.
Must states abide by the Second Amendment?
On November 16, the Second Amendment Foundation filed a brief in the U.S. Supreme Court case of McDonald v. Chicago, challenging the constitutionality of the city’s ban on handguns.
Ohio AG weighs in on McDonald v. Chicago
Ohio Attorney General Richard Cordray believes the people's Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms is fundamental and cannot be denied by state and local governments. He outlined his perspective in an exclusive interview with Public Nuisance Wire.
Ohio AG to address Supreme Court on gun rights case
COLUMBUS, Ohio -- After the U.S. Supreme Court granted full review to examine the case of McDonald v. Chicago and its implications for Second Amendment rights, Ohio Attorney General Richard Cordray announced he would join in the arguments.
Recent Entries
- Our watchdog press enabled the global warming hoax 10 Feb 2010
- Climategate takes steam out of global warming litigation 03 Feb 2010
- Courts rule against cities in subprime mortgage suits 27 Jan 2010
- Utah manufacturers protest EPA action 20 Jan 2010
- Memphis jumps on the subprime suit bandwagon 13 Jan 2010
- The case for scrapping product liability 06 Jan 2010
- Facts fudged in smoking ban campaigns 05 Jan 2010
- Public nuisance highlights 30 Dec 2009
- 2009 paint litigation roundup 29 Dec 2009
- Damage caps were an essential piece of tort reform 28 Dec 2009
Browse News by State
Tag Cloud
Superior Court of Santa Clara County v. Atlantic Richfield Co. Amicus Briefs Energy State of North Carolina v. TVA Appeals Legislation Global Warming Rhode Island v. Lead Industries Assn. Lead Paint Cleveland v. Deutsche Bank Subprime Mortgages Litigation Kivalina v. Exxon Mobil Indiana Georgia Ohio California Washington, D.C. North Carolina West Virginia Colorado Wisconsin Rhode Island New York Oklahoma Pennsylvania Federal Clean Air Act Paint Lead paint poisoning State of Oklahoma v. Tyson Foods et. al. Missouri Public Utility New Mexico Maryland Banking Lending Practices Cigarette Taxes Tobacco Washington Federal Clean Water Act Secondhand smoke Real Estate Product Safety Manufacturing Insurance Public Nuisance Liability Agriculture/Food American Clean Energy and Security Act Gaming Coal Kentucky Mississippi Tennessee Connecticut Restaurants, Bars, etc. Search and Rescue Alabama Oil Alien Tort Statute Auto Alaska State of Rhode Island v. Lead Industries Assn. et. al. United Kingdom Beer, Wine & Spirits Public drinking Seafood Mercury poisoning Children's Toys Guns Second Amendment Trellvion Gaines v. Sherwin-Williams State of North Carolina v. Tennessee Valley Authority County of Santa Clara vs. Atlantic Richfield Co Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly Ashcroft v. Iqbal Conley v. Gibson Pleading standards State of Illinois v. Wells Fargo Illinois Coal-fired power plant pollutants City of Cleveland v. Deutsche Bank et. al. City of Kivalina v. Exxon Mobil et. al. Endangered Species MTBE City of New York v Exxon Mobil Mass tort abuses Virginia Idaho Grazing rights Wyoming Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Janssen Pharmaceutica Florida Tort reform Colombia Coca-Cola Philip Morris Product labeling Adames v. Beretta Nicaragua Contingency arrangements Pharmaceuticals Medicine Medical liability Connecticut v. AEP Asbestos Poultry litter McDonald v. Chicago District of Columbia v. Heller City of Santa Clara v. ARCO Comer v. Murphy Oil USA Hopi Chevron Travel Priceline.com v. City of Anaheim State attorney general abuses Double Quick v Ronnie Lee Lymas Utah
Subscribe to our newsletter
RSS Feed
